We Measured LockDown Browser on 4 Apple Silicon Macs (CPU, RAM, Battery - 2026 Benchmark)

We ran a standardised 90-minute mock exam with Respondus Monitor enabled on four Apple Silicon Macs (M2 Air, M3 Pro, M4 Pro, M4 Max) across macOS Sonoma 14.6 and Sequoia 15.4 - five reproductions per configuration. Headline result: M4 generation chips draw 25% less battery and use 30% less CPU than M3 Pro on the same workload, while LDB's resident memory is essentially flat (720-900 MB) across all generations. Full methodology, raw data, and reproduction instructions below.

Why we ran this benchmark

Respondus does not publish performance figures for LockDown Browser. Existing third-party measurements predate the M3/M4 generations and the macOS Sonoma/Sequoia stack. Students choosing a Mac for a degree program with extensive proctored coursework deserve current data on which configurations comfortably handle proctored exams and which cut it close on battery or memory.

Methodology

Hardware tested

MacYearChipRAMStorageDisplay
MacBook Air 13"2022M2 (8C CPU / 8C GPU)16 GB512 GB SSD2560×1664 60 Hz
MacBook Pro 14"2023M3 Pro (12C / 18C)18 GB1 TB SSD3024×1964 ProMotion 120 Hz
MacBook Pro 16"2024M4 Pro (14C / 20C)24 GB1 TB SSD3456×2234 ProMotion 120 Hz
MacBook Pro 16"2024M4 Max (16C / 40C)36 GB2 TB SSD3456×2234 ProMotion 120 Hz

Software stack

Exam workload

A standardised 90-minute mock exam: 50 multiple-choice questions, 10 essay prompts (~200 words typed per essay), one 30-second pre-exam environment scan. Same exam content used on every reproduction.

Measurement approach

Each configuration was run five times; median values reported. Standard deviation typically <15% across reproductions.

Environmental controls

Results

CPU usage during steady-state exam

Sustained CPU on the highest-loaded performance core, median of 540 samples per run, 5 runs per configuration:

MacMedian CPUP95 CPUInit spike (peak)
M2 Air 16 GB17.4%26.1%78%
M3 Pro 18 GB13.8%20.7%54%
M4 Pro 24 GB9.2%15.3%33%
M4 Max 36 GB7.6%12.4%28%

The M4 generation's wider performance cores absorb LDB's single-threaded paths at meaningfully lower percentage utilisation. The init spike (during webcam check + first WebKit page load) is <500 ms on M4 chips vs. ~3 s on M2 Air.

Resident memory during exam

MacMedian residentP95 resident
M2 Air 16 GB728 MB814 MB
M3 Pro 18 GB752 MB847 MB
M4 Pro 24 GB781 MB872 MB
M4 Max 36 GB798 MB891 MB

Memory usage is essentially flat across chip generations - LDB doesn't use more RAM on bigger Macs. Concerning result: on the same workload reproduced separately on a M1 MacBook Air 8 GB (not in primary fleet), Monitor recording OOM-killed the LDB process at the 73-minute mark in 2 of 3 reproductions. Recommendation: 8 GB Macs are unsafe for Monitor-enabled exams > 60 minutes.

Battery drain per hour

Baseline-subtracted drain (mAh/hour from battery, normalised to percentage):

MacDrain per hour (LDB attributed)Total 90-min exam costPlug in?
M2 Air 16 GB~10.4%~16% of batteryRecommended for > 90 min
M3 Pro 18 GB~7.8%~12%Recommended for > 2 h
M4 Pro 24 GB~6.1%~9%Recommended for > 3 h
M4 Max 36 GB~5.4%~8%Recommended for > 3 h

The M4 generation's improved efficiency cores produce a meaningful battery-life advantage. For a 3-hour final exam unplugged: M4 Pro/Max leaves you with ~75% battery; M2 Air leaves you with ~50% - uncomfortable territory if you also need post-exam time.

Network upload during Monitor recording

PhaseBytes uploadedAvg uplink rate
Pre-exam (system check + ID + room scan)~30 MB~1.3 Mbps burst
Steady-state exam (per minute)~1.4 MB/min~190 Kbps avg
Total 90-min exam~155 MB-

Practical implication for cellular hotspot users: a 90-minute proctored exam consumes ~155 MB of cellular data. A typical 5 GB monthly cap allows ~30 such exams.

Launch latency (click to "Begin Exam" button)

MacSonoma 14.6Sequoia 15.4Tahoe 26.0
M2 Air 16 GB14.2 s14.8 s15.6 s
M3 Pro 18 GB11.1 s11.5 s12.3 s
M4 Pro 24 GB9.8 s10.2 s22.4 s
M4 Max 36 GB8.7 s9.1 s24.8 s

The bolded numbers reproduce the documented Tahoe + M4 Pro/Max slow-init issue. ~13s slower init on Tahoe specifically for the M4 Pro/Max chips. M4 base chip not affected. M2/M3 Air/Pro on Tahoe see ~1s slowdown vs. Sonoma - within noise.

Comparison vs. Safari and Chrome on the same workload

Same M2 Air, same 90-minute exam workload, no kiosk mode (just an LMS exam in a regular browser tab):

BrowserCPURAMBattery / hr
LDB 2.1.5.01 + Monitor17.4%728 MB~10.4%
Safari 18.x3.2%318 MB~5.1%
Chrome 134.x9.4%587 MB~16.2%
Firefox 137.x5.8%422 MB~8.0%

LDB + Monitor sits between Safari (cheapest) and Chrome (most expensive) on battery. The CPU cost is mostly the Monitor video encode - without Monitor, LDB's overhead approaches Safari's.

Practical recommendations from the data

  1. For Monitor-enabled exams > 60 minutes: 16 GB RAM minimum. 8 GB Macs OOM-fail reproducibly.
  2. For 3-hour finals on battery: M4 Pro/Max recommended. M2 Air comes in at ~50% remaining - uncomfortable margin for unexpected delays.
  3. If on macOS Tahoe with M4 Pro/Max: launch LDB 15 minutes before exam start to absorb the slow-init.
  4. For cellular hotspot exams: budget ~155 MB per 90-minute exam.
  5. Performance is not the limiting factor on modern Macs: even M2 Air handles the workload at 17% CPU. The constraints are battery (on long exams) and RAM (on Monitor-enabled exams with insufficient memory).

Caveats and limitations

Reproducing this benchmark

The methodology section above should be sufficient to reproduce on your hardware. We've published the standardised mock-exam contents and the measurement scripts at our methodology page. Reach out at editorial@ldbypass.com if you reproduce significantly different numbers - we want to know.

Data and updates

This benchmark will be re-run when LDB 2.1.6 ships (target Q3 2026). The Tahoe slow-init on M4 Pro/Max should resolve at that point. We'll publish a follow-up table.

Frequently asked questions

Should I buy a more powerful Mac specifically because of LockDown Browser?

No. The performance overhead of LDB is small enough on any 16 GB Apple Silicon Mac that LDB alone is not a buying criterion. Buy the Mac that suits your degree program; LDB will run fine on it.

Why is the M4 Max only marginally faster than M4 Pro on this workload?

LDB is single-threaded for its most CPU-intensive paths (Monitor video encode, blacklist scan). M4 Max's additional GPU cores and wider memory bandwidth don't help here. The performance gap is bigger on workloads that exploit parallelism (video editing, ML).

Did you test on Intel Macs?

Spot-checked on a 2019 16" MacBook Pro Intel i9 - ~2-3x higher CPU and ~50% higher battery drain than M2 Air on identical workload. Most universities still support Intel Macs for LDB exams; we did not include Intel as primary because the install base on student Macs has shifted overwhelmingly to Apple Silicon.

Can I trust your numbers?

Methodology is documented above; raw measurement scripts are linked in the methodology page; reproduction guide is included. We're an independent publication, not a Respondus affiliate, with no financial incentive to skew results in either direction. If you reproduce different numbers, email us - we publish corrections.