Proctortrack vs LockDown Browser on Mac - Continuous Biometric vs Kiosk

Proctortrack (Verificient) employs continuous biometric facial recognition throughout the exam - checking that you, the student, are physically present moment-to-moment. LockDown Browser does periodic checks. Proctortrack is the most invasive tool in mainstream higher-ed deployment as of 2026.

The continuous biometric difference

Proctortrack's differentiator: it doesn't just record video for human review. It runs continuous facial recognition matching against your enrolled biometric reference, checking every few seconds that "you" are still there.

BehaviorProctortrackLDB + Monitor
Pre-exam ID verificationBiometric face-matchingPhoto of student ID
During-exam identity checkContinuous (every few seconds)Recording for later review
If face leaves frame >5sActive alert / pauseLogged for review
If different face appearsReal-time biometric mismatch alertRecorded; reviewed later
Biometric data storageYes - matched against on each examNo - recordings only

Privacy implications of continuous biometric

Several jurisdictions have specific protections for biometric data:

If you're in Illinois, Texas, EU, California, or another jurisdiction with biometric protection, your university must obtain explicit consent - and you can refuse without academic consequence in some configurations.

Performance + footprint on Mac

Accessibility

Continuous facial recognition exacerbates the disparate-accuracy problem. False rejections (algorithm doesn't recognize you in your own session due to lighting / angle / disparity) cause panic mid-exam. Documented cases of students with darker skin tones being repeatedly "denied access" mid-exam by the biometric matcher.

Student experience compared

ConcernProctortrackLDB + Monitor
Stress during examHigh (continuous biometric)Medium
Looking away to thinkMay trigger biometric mismatchLogged for review
Pets / family entering frameReal-time alert; may pause examRecorded; reviewed later
Mac battery cost~12-15%/hr~10%/hr
Network failure toleranceLower (continuous biometric needs reliable upload)Better

If your university uses Proctortrack

  1. Verify written consent. If you're in Illinois, Texas, EU, or California, you should have an explicit consent form. If you don't, raise it with the privacy office.
  2. Test the biometric enrollment in advance. Lighting at your exam location should match enrollment lighting closely.
  3. Plan for stable network. Proctortrack tolerates network drops worse than LDB.
  4. Document accessibility concerns. If continuous biometric processing causes anxiety / disability flags, the disability office is your path.
  5. Consider alternatives. In-person exam is increasingly offered for biometric-objecting students.

Where Proctortrack wins (rare)

For typical higher-ed coursework, the trade-offs are unfavorable for most students.

Frequently asked questions

Can my biometric data be subpoenaed?

Yes - like any data held by a service, Proctortrack's privacy policy commits to legal-process compliance. Your facial biometric template is data that can be subpoenaed.

What happens to my biometric data if Proctortrack is acquired or shuts down?

Per their privacy policy, biometric data is supposed to be deleted within a specified period after the educational relationship ends. Acquisition events typically transfer data to the acquirer; you have right of access under various laws.

Is Proctortrack legal in my state / country?

Generally yes, but with consent requirements that vary. Check with your state's data-protection authority or privacy lawyer. In EU + Illinois + Texas + California, additional protections apply.